|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 19:45:33 GMT -5
23-23. Kill by IND to back left corner. PSU challenge in/out. Looks out to me. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 19:48:05 GMT -5
Call reversed, PSU up 24-22.
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 19:48:18 GMT -5
Match pt for PSU.
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 19:49:30 GMT -5
PSU takes match 25-22 on IND attack. Of course, a challenge. Who is the coach that always did a challenge on match pt. John Cook?
|
|
|
|
Post by traveler on Nov 11, 2022 19:49:39 GMT -5
pulling a carlston
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 19:51:13 GMT -5
Call confirmed, PSU takes match. Much tighter match then previous match. Better played also.
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 19:53:13 GMT -5
Totals after match
_________PSU IND
Hitting .211 .141
Kills______46 32
Blocks____8___8
Aces_____3___5
Serve errs_7__11
Digs_____36__29
|
|
|
|
Post by dc155 on Nov 11, 2022 20:01:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 20:02:15 GMT -5
Allie was 10-1-16, hitting .562;
Katie was 8-4-15, hitting .267;
Markely was 8-4-23, hitting .174;
Kash was 8-8-22, hitting .000;
Zoe was 5-3-12, hititng .167;
Starck only had one attempt which is really low for her.
It sure looks to me like teams are preparing for Kash and don't want to let her beat them. Kash is gonna need to adjust, as what's she's doing now isn't working. Not sure, (in todays game), how many bad sets led to her 8 errors.
Edit: I don't have the stats at my fingertips, but I think that Kash has had some sub par matches over the last 4-5 matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by dc155 on Nov 11, 2022 20:05:34 GMT -5
Kudos to Indiana - They are much more competitive now than they were in September.
Also, did anyone else catch the Indiana BTN+ commentators sharing that Steve Aird said that Penn State reached out to him about the PSU job but he felt like he was building something there? I found that interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 20:07:32 GMT -5
PSU let IND back in the 3rd set, with IND having a 7-1 run to tie the set up 21-21. Curious about other people's impression. It sure seems that even the best teams are allowing teams to get back in a set with long runs. I saw a stat on Texas where they had let teams back into a set on 4 different occasions. I know that in the NEB - WISC match that NEB allowed WISC to have long runs in at least 2 of the 3 sets. I must say, that even tho NEB was swept, it was a really hard fought match. That result must have really pleased people whose favorite teams are PSU and whoever is playing NEB  . |
|
|
|
Post by jojonito on Nov 11, 2022 20:09:23 GMT -5
Kudos to Indiana - They are much more competitive now than they were in September. Also, did anyone else catch the Indiana BTN+ commentators sharing that Steve Aird said that Penn State reached out to him about the PSU job but he felt like he was building something there? I found that interesting. I wonder if that was because at IND he already had a start, whereas at PSU there was the danger of a mass exodus. We'll never know |
|
|
|
Post by nyline on Nov 11, 2022 20:14:26 GMT -5
Kudos to Indiana - They are much more competitive now than they were in September. Also, did anyone else catch the Indiana BTN+ commentators sharing that Steve Aird said that Penn State reached out to him about the PSU job but he felt like he was building something there? I found that interesting. Reaching out for a 1st Round interview is much different than being a finalist contender. I'm guessing it was the search committee being thorough. And I think it would have been a bit odd if they hadn't at least touched base with him. |
|
|
|
Post by pennstate1973 on Nov 11, 2022 20:31:13 GMT -5
There are no easy teams in the B1G. Stanford would have a losing record in this conference.
|
|
|
|
Post by nyline on Nov 11, 2022 20:33:27 GMT -5
There are no easy teams in the B1G. Stanford would have a losing record in this conference. I agree with your first point -- it's a very tough conference. As to your second point, I defer to your knowledge of Stanford. You've been pretty spot-on. |
|
.
