|
|
Post by seeyajohn on Sept 21, 2016 22:38:01 GMT -5
Here is a breakout of points scored by rotation, set, and server for all matches prior to the B1G opener vs. Rutgers. It is probably not 100% accurate, but close.
Rotation sw sl rw rl PW PL % SO A SO% OSO OA OSO%
1 82 70 71 34 153 104 59.5% 71 105 67.6% 70 152 46.1%
2 74 70 71 37 145 107 57.5% 71 108 65.7% 70 144 48.6%
3 73 65 71 27 144 92 61.0% 71 98 72.4% 65 138 47.1%
4 49 62 62 46 111 108 50.7% 62 108 57.4% 62 111 55.9%
5 54 61 63 22 117 83 58.5% 63 85 74.1% 61 115 53.0%
6 74 68 63 37 137 105 56.6% 63 100 63.0% 68 142 47.9%
Total 406 396 401 203 807 599 57.4% 401 604 66.4% 396 802 49.4%
set 1 126 122 123 52 249 174 58.9% 123 175 70.3% 122 248 49.2%
set 2 113 115 119 66 232 181 56.2% 119 185 64.3% 115 228 50.4%
set 3 130 111 111 48 241 159 60.3% 111 159 69.8% 111 241 46.1%
set 4 35 37 38 18 73 55 57.0% 38 56 67.9% 37 72 51.4%
set 5 2 11 10 19 12 30 28.6% 10 29 34.5% 11 13 84.6%
SERVER sw sl
Weiskercher 20 19 51.3% sw = serves won
Frantti 42 39 51.9% sl = serves lost
Holcomb 14 18 43.8% rw = receptions won
White 53 60 46.9% rl = receptions lost
L Pierce 27 26 50.9% PW = points won
Detering 64 55 53.8% PL = points lost
Washington 69 67 50.7% SO% = side out percentage
Lee 51 45 53.1% OSO% = opponents side out percentage
Krause 11 14 44.0%
Broerman 13 18 41.9%
Sciorra 13 5 72.2%
Rivera 20 26 43.5%
Muller 3 1 75.0%
Farrell 6 3 66.7%
Powers 0 0
Total 406 396 50.6%
|
|
|
|
Post by nyline on Sept 22, 2016 5:34:13 GMT -5
Great stuff! Thanks for doing this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Millennium on Sept 22, 2016 9:07:50 GMT -5
Here is a breakout of points scored by rotation, set, and server for all matches prior to the B1G opener vs. Rutgers.
Awesome stat table. So, it seems, rotations 4 is the most troublesome. Whose on the floor and in what positions, typically, for that rotation? |
|
|
|
Post by seeyajohn on Sept 22, 2016 14:32:30 GMT -5
Here is a breakout of points scored by rotation, set, and server for all matches prior to the B1G opener vs. Rutgers.
Awesome stat table. So, it seems, rotations 4 is the most troublesome. Whose on the floor and in what positions, typically, for that rotation? Lately Russ has most frequently had Holcomb serving. Front row is Frantti Washington and Detering. White and Lee complete the back row. On serve receive they stack Washington and Detering to the far left, drop Frantti back to receive on the left with White in the middle, Lee on the right and Holcomb behind everyone. |
|
|
|
Post by seeyajohn on Oct 17, 2016 12:57:27 GMT -5
Here are updated rotation stats for all B1G matches through the Indiana match. Rotation 4 seems to have improved with the usual substitution of Holcomb for Thielen, Rotation 3 statistics were heavily impacted by Laura Broerman's runs of 6 and 8 in the Rutgers match.
Rotation sw sl rw rl PW PL % SO A SO% OSO OA OSO%
1 69 59 60 26 129 85 60.3% 60 86 69.8% 59 128 46.1%
2 38 55 58 25 96 80 54.5% 58 83 69.9% 55 93 59.1%
3 63 47 54 16 117 63 65.0% 54 70 77.1% 47 110 42.7%
4 38 45 45 20 83 65 56.1% 45 65 69.2% 45 83 54.2%
5 53 48 47 15 100 63 61.3% 47 62 75.8% 48 101 47.5%
6 51 55 55 33 106 88 54.6% 55 88 62.5% 55 106 51.9%
Total 312 309 319 135 631 444 58.7% 319 454 70.3% 309 621 49.8%
Rotation 1 Detering at serving position sw = serves won
Rotation 2 Washington at serving position sl = serves lost
Rotation 3 Franti at serving position rw = receptions won
Rotation 4 Holcomb at serving position rl = receptions lost
Rotation 5 White at serving position PW = points won
Rotation 6 Lee at serving position PL = points lost
|
|
|
|
Post by Millennium on Oct 17, 2016 14:19:16 GMT -5
Here are updated rotation stats for all B1G matches through the Indiana match. Rotation 4 seems to have improved with the usual substitution of Holcomb for Thielen, Rotation 3 statistics were heavily impacted by Laura Broerman's runs of 6 and 8 in the Rutgers match.
Rotation sw sl rw rl PW PL % SO A SO% OSO OA OSO%
1 69 59 60 26 129 85 60.3% 60 86 69.8% 59 128 46.1%
2 38 55 58 25 96 80 54.5% 58 83 69.9% 55 93 59.1%
3 63 47 54 16 117 63 65.0% 54 70 77.1% 47 110 42.7%
4 38 45 45 20 83 65 56.1% 45 65 69.2% 45 83 54.2%
5 53 48 47 15 100 63 61.3% 47 62 75.8% 48 101 47.5%
6 51 55 55 33 106 88 54.6% 55 88 62.5% 55 106 51.9%
Total 312 309 319 135 631 444 58.7% 319 454 70.3% 309 621 49.8%
Rotation 1 Detering at serving position sw = serves won
Rotation 2 Washington at serving position sl = serves lost
Rotation 3 Franti at serving position rw = receptions won
Rotation 4 Holcomb at serving position rl = receptions lost
Rotation 5 White at serving position PW = points won
Rotation 6 Lee at serving position PL = points lost
Aaahhh, much easier to follow the stats from this table now while watching future matches (since you entered the expected server in each rotation) Thanks. Nice work. |
|
|
|
Post by tillie1014 on Oct 17, 2016 16:54:50 GMT -5
Big data is wonderful to study and provides some insights into results.
However rotations maybe impacted by the opponents rotation requiring a change in our personnel locations to face better blocking or attacking opportunities.
That is coach may want to have our best blocking player facing their best hitter or perhaps positioning our best serve*receive player when their best server is on the line.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 18:40:19 GMT -5
Big data is wonderful to study and provides some insights into results. However rotations maybe impacted by the opponents rotation requiring a change in our personnel locations to face better blocking or attacking opportunities. That is coach may want to have our best blocking player facing their best hitter or perhaps positioning our best serve*receive player when their best server is on the line. Lotsa variables to consider. One of the joys of presenting statistics is the certitude that you've not considered all the permutations and combinations that our gentle readers will identify. I like the stats you're bringing john. Please continue. |
|
|
|
Post by traveler on Oct 17, 2016 19:19:10 GMT -5
John,
Your thoughts about why Ro 6 is the weakest?
I would have thought it would be our best because setter is at net, in the prime position to take passes. Not that 60% is bad! I just thought it would be the best.
BTW, tried to find the tape of it and have not been successful...in what I presumed was Ro 6, Lee was in the back corner and I mean corner. as if Moses were parting the Red Sea, she comes from out of a crowd and just mows down the ball with an attack that reminded me of Courtney. It is poetry in motion. Deserves to be watched in slo mo. Happened this weekend and that seems to be all I can say definitely!
|
|
|
|
Post by Millennium on Oct 17, 2016 19:40:33 GMT -5
Our sideout percentage overall of 70.3% is fantastic. Let's hope we can keep that up against tougher opponents coming up in the next 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by seeyajohn on Oct 18, 2016 11:24:35 GMT -5
Here is a table of points scored on serves by the major PSU servers. Server PW PL % Server PW PL % Broerman 35 19 64.8% Holcomb 33 35 48.5%
Detering 69 59 53.9% Pierce 26 29 47.3%
Weiskercher 20 18 52.6% Lee 22 27 44.9%
White 50 47 51.5% Washington 26 46 36.1%
Frantti 19 19 50.0%
Laura's numbers are primarily the result of an 18-4 match against Rutgers.
|
|
|
|
Post by tillie1014 on Oct 20, 2016 15:51:53 GMT -5
DEFINITION PLEASE On the chart for digs there is a heading SP which I believe is setS played but then there is a further category MP and under that is (MS)  Thanks |
|
|
|
Post by nyline on Oct 20, 2016 16:38:36 GMT -5
DEFINITION PLEASE On the chart for digs there is a heading SP which I believe is setS played but then there is a further category MP and under that is (MS) Thanks guessing matches played and matches started |
|
|
|
Post by Millennium on Oct 20, 2016 17:13:58 GMT -5
DEFINITION PLEASE On the chart for digs there is a heading SP which I believe is setS played but then there is a further category MP and under that is (MS) Thanks Which chart are you looking at? |
|
|
|
Post by traveler on Oct 20, 2016 17:31:28 GMT -5
Matches started, if I understand, can be misleading as there can only be 6 starters +L. Most teams would start their big name hitters, not, for instance, Holcomb. They would then sub the DS for the hitter.
I don't know why Coach has started doing this. I don't believe he had Lacey Fuller in or Dom as starters when they weren't wearing the blue jersey. But i can imagine it sends a HUGE message to all the DSs that they matter.
And they sure do matter this year!
|
|
